. . . . . entries for 28.3.07 . . . . .

Observation: the mainstream ideal of feminine beauty/sexuality has changed considerably in the past millenium, but the ideal of male beauty/sexuality has not. Discuss.

[] . . . ees @ 10:38:00 PM
Comments:
true dat...
*discusses*

but i'm a grass type, what?
 
You solarbeamed Matt.

And this is a very poor discussion.
 
Oh it most definitely has changed..
Men who were large and manly were once considered attractive where now the attractive standard is usually one of "metrosexual" and "pretty boy" status. Think of our celebrity icons, Jude Law, Johnny Depp.. they're all rather feminine looking boys.

.. Just saying. xD
 
On the contrary, "pretty boys" were always counted attractive - it's just that they've typically been the objects of not female but male desire. I think "manly men" are still considered attractive by the majority of women, whereas "pretty boys" are still something of a specialized taste. Hem. Vera. Theatrenerdgirl.
 
Uh... but I didn't solarbeam Matt, somebody else did.
 
Fine, I'll discuss, for real - yeah, it seems that the feminine 'ideal' enforced by the media changes all the time, but smart guys (and by this, I mean the ones w/ common sense (the ones worth dating), not necessarily the nerdy ones (though they're often smart in a common sense sort of way, but not always)) know that there's more to beauty than matching up with some stupid media-enforced ideal.

The same applies for the male 'ideal' - it has changed somewhat in recent years, perhaps not as much, but honestly... I'm much more attracted to real people (well, person - I think we all know who) than to silly media icons.

And for the life of me, I can't understand why so many people want to f*ck Dr. House. He's *old* for crying out loud. old *and* grumpy.
 
He's an interesting character. A total son of a bitch, of course, but interesting - and admirable and endearing in a perverse sort of way.

But I wouldn't date him. :P

Media is a new word. What about Botticelli's Venus or Michelangelo's David? Those were representative of that period's ideals of beauty, and they were art, not "media" in the way we think of it.

I am not sure if I'm going anywhere with this. :P
 
All of these things come in cycles. The qualities that make a man attractive have changed over the years just as much as the qualities that make a woman attractive. For example, today's ideal of the "manly man" would be tan and muscular. In Victorian England, "tan and muscular" translated to "barbaric heathen." Their attractive men were pale and thin, because those were the signs of being successful in their society. These things change, trends coming and going, as the standards by which we measure success change.
 
Post a Comment

come home?

.:people:.

{ting}
she looks like the real thing
{mari}
out and about
[kelsey]
THIS IS AMERICA
{yianni}
stop being depressed
{alisa}
other
[shannon]
close and far
{frank}
islands where no islands should go
[cassie]
eating knowledge
{colin}
my dm
[emily]
shoulder to the wheel
[brian]
nostalgic for fantasy
[nicole]
industry insider
{elle}
angry enviro
[matt]
never heard of miyazaki
[pirate dan]
are you reading this?
[olga]
distracted
[messiah dan]
messiah/believer
{max}
approach focus
[natalie]
wait a minute
[susan]
solitude
{greg}
manbeargreg

.:past:.

April 2002
May 2002
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
February 2010
March 2010
April 2010
May 2010
June 2010
July 2010
August 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
April 2011
May 2011
June 2011
July 2011
August 2011
November 2011
January 2012
February 2012
March 2012
June 2012
April 2013
May 2013
June 2013

.:skin:.

turtles! turtles! by araglas
(heavily modified by yours truly)